Skip to main content

how I hate the term "crossdressing"

I still see older transgender people and their spouses use the term “crossdressing” to describe what is essentially someone being themselves. No spouse should ever be lied to but then no one has the right to hold someone prisoner for something as utterly benign as dressing in the clothes normally associated with the opposite sex. No, its not like killing puppies.

Some women are disgusted by it and that is their right while others might be even amused by it; it runs the gamut it seems. But the double standard that says a woman can express herself with more latitude while a male is supposed to stay inside a limited track is disturbing to me and, should I ever enter any kind of relationship again, my identity will not be up for negotiation.

The truth is that we live in a world where we are supposed to be straight jacketed into submission and, whatever the cause of gender dysphoria, we should never allow someone else to call our right of self-expression a compulsion or a filthy habit simply because it breaks one of society's cardinal rules.

My militancy in this blog runs in two directions: I am against the transgender lobby that equates happiness and authenticity exclusively with a full transition but is also aimed at the people who understand nothing of dysphoria and think that gender expression outside accepted norms is rooted in perversion (an idea encouraged in large part through 20th century psychiatric quackery) or as passing fad and are outraged because it doesn’t fit society's idea of normalcy.

Well I have news for current or potential partners who are disturbed by gender behavior outside the norm: transgender people are indeed small in number but they have a right to exist and to find happiness where they can and if you don’t like it then find someone else in your life. If you have been told in advance then consider yourself fortunate for you have nothing to complain about.

While to transgender people I would say: be honest always and come out into the light because it is not shameful to be you and do not accept anything less than being loved exactly as you are; if for no other reason than you deserve it. If you don't find that love outside then console yourself with love from within and be happy in your own skin.

Comments

  1. Beautifully put Joanna. Our right to self-expression and self-acceptance stated perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Rhonda, very well said Joanna! I'd like add something Brene Brown writes about shame: it thrives in the darkness and wilts in the sun. Expose it freely to others and watch it disappear!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed. I have a follower on my blog who's e-mailed me many times to describe his difficulties with his wife from his "crossdressing." (I also hate that word.) He feels ashamed of it because of her disapproval. I try to help but I'm not in their lives so my impact is limited to giving advice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Perhaps I am missing the obvious, but in my opinion the term "crossdressing" is a fairly benign word. Many individuals self-describe themselves using that term. It doesn't seem to have the same amount of connotative baggage as a term like "queer" has. Has it and can it be misused? Of course it can, but that is true of most words.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kati the term has acquired a meaning and language has power. In our culture that word mostly has a negative connotation.

      if some people want to self identify that way it is their prerogative..

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

prejudice disguised as objective rectitude

So here is Professor Jordan Peterson perhaps justly calling out the excesses of political correctness gone mad. But then he extends it to not indulging transgender people the basic dignity of being addressed in their preferred pronoun. To do so for him would cost nothing and to stand on literal principle seems to serve little use other than to send a message of disdain.

If you have transitioned or even live as the opposite gender is costs me nothing to address you in your preferred pronouns. What difference does it make to me and what am I trying to tell you when I don't?

Peterson wants to stand on his rights to call reality what it is except that in this case the exact objective escapes me. But of course the right wing Federalist is in love with him because he calls a spade a spade.

If I see a rock I can call it that but then the rock doesn’t have any feelings. To address a transgender woman "her" and "she" is not undermining my rights as a person in any way b…

"Oh please its 2016!"

I have mentioned before that I have a lovely young couple living above the unit next to mine. Well the other day as I was getting in the door, she and I overlapped for the first time with me dressed as a woman.

We had a nice conversation and at some point I mentioned the obvious which was that I had told her future husband that they might see me in a different guise from time to time so they wouldn't wonder about who the strange woman was. She just looked at me almost rolling her eyes while smiling from ear to ear and said:

"Oh Please it's 2016!"

For the record she was also very complementary regarding my choice of attire.

I could care less at this point in my life what people think but it is still lovely to see the millennial generation's freedom of spirit and acceptance so lacking in previous generations. Yes they have their own foibles, as does every generation, but this area certainly isn't one of them.

the pseudoscience behind gender dysphoria

The real science as to what causes gender dysphoria still awaits.

Harry Benjamin was on to something except he didn’t have the scientific evidence to back up his suspicions hence, like a true scientist, he negated to draw conclusions. His hunch, based on treating so many patients over his lifetime, was that one is born with a predisposition to be gender dysphoric.

However, with inconclusive brain scans and no DNA marker (as of yet) we are left with believing the word of people who need help and only want to lead happy and productive lives.

The best we have been able to muster since Benjamin's death in 1986 was to amass statistics on who gets a boner imagining themselves as a woman which is in equal parts pathetic and disappointing. For this is not really science at all but is instead playing with interview data that doesn't point to anything definitive or conclusive. I have dealt with this problem at great length in my blog.

The whole thing started with Kurt Freund's obses…